Pick Playwright if
teams who will stay on the OSS runner at $0 while they open a first Trace Viewer — then add their own CI, not Cypress Cloud Team $67 first unless they want Cypress’s hosted dashboard.
Read the Playwright pagePlaywright vs TestSprite
Our take
Pick Playwright if you're on a team who will stay on the OSS runner at $0 while they open a first Trace Viewer — then add their own CI, not Cypress Cloud Team $67 first unless they want Cypress’s hosted dashboard. Pick TestSprite if you're on a aI-native team who will stay on $0, then $19 Starter. Skip TestSprite if you're people who want to own every selector in git (Playwright).
Best for
Playwright A trace you start at a public $
TestSprite An autonomous QA loop with a public $0–$69 card
Free plan
Playwright No free plan
TestSprite $0 · / month. 1 environment; 30 days history; 150 monthly credits; 1 repo PR gate; Slack
Lowest paid
Playwright Not published by the vendor
TestSprite Standard $39
Next step up
Playwright
TestSprite Pro $69
Runs where
Playwright Hosted
TestSprite Local or hosted
Watch out
Playwright No hosted cloud runner in core
TestSprite Credits are on the compare table (150 on Free) but a credit’s burn rate is not printed
Last checked
Playwright 2026-10-23 · playwright.dev
TestSprite 2026-10-28 · testsprite.com/pricing
Which one, then?
Pick TestSprite if
aI-native teams who will stay on $0, then $19 Starter.
Read the TestSprite page