aitoolsnav.com

Cypress vs Playwright

Our take

Pick Cypress if teams who will stay on the MIT App + Cloud Starter (500 results / month) while they Replay a first failed heroes.cy.ts, then Team at $67/month ($799/year) when they need flake analytics — not Business $267 first unless they need SSO and spec prioritization. Pick Playwright if teams who will stay on the OSS runner at $0 while they open a first Trace Viewer — then add their own CI, not Cypress Cloud

Cypress

Cypress

open-source E2E runner plus Cypress Cloud

Playwright

Playwright

Microsoft’s browser-automation desk

Best for

Cypress Browser tests you start at a public $

Playwright A trace you start at a public $

Free plan

Cypress $0 · ), MIT. Local / CI without --record

Playwright No free plan

Lowest paid

Cypress Cloud Team $67/mo

Playwright Not published by the vendor

Next step up

Cypress Cloud Business $267/mo

Playwright

Runs where

Cypress

Playwright Hosted

Watch out

Cypress Cloud Starter caps recorded results at 500 / month

Playwright No hosted cloud runner in core

Last checked

Cypress 2026-10-23 · cypress.io/pricing

Playwright 2026-10-23 · playwright.dev

Which one, then?

Pick Cypress if

teams who will stay on the MIT App + Cloud Starter (500 results / month) while they Replay a first failed heroes.cy.ts, then Team at $67/month ($799/year) when they need flake analytics — not Business $267 first unless they need SSO and spec prioritization.

Read the Cypress page

Pick Playwright if

teams who will stay on the OSS runner at $0 while they open a first Trace Viewer — then add their own CI, not Cypress Cloud Team $67 first unless they want Cypress’s hosted dashboard.

Read the Playwright page

Other comparisons