Pick Luma AI if
developers and studios who want Ray in an API or the Luma app after login.
Read the Luma AI pageLuma AI vs Tripo
Our take
Pick Luma AI if developers and studios who want Ray in an API or the Luma app after login. Pick Tripo if game and print makers who will pay Pro so more than Free’s 200 public, non-commercial credits sit on a private asset. Skip Luma AI if people who need a signed-out “What will you create today?” box (Runway) or Kling’s consumer composer (Kling AI).
Luma AI
Ray/uni Agents API. Plus
Best for
Luma AI Ray video or uni image in a pipeline
Tripo A game- or print-ready 3D asset in the browser
Free plan
Luma AI No free plan
Tripo $0 · 200 monthly credits (≈13 models). 1 concurrent task; public models; non-commercial; limited history / exports
Lowest paid
Luma AI Plus $30
Tripo Pro $20/mo yearly, or $20 monthly
Next step up
Luma AI Pro $90
Tripo Max from $90/mo yearly
Coding agent
Luma AI Agents REST Quickstart
Tripo
Runs where
Luma AI Hosted
Tripo
Watch out
Luma AI No signed-out consumer composer
Tripo $20 / $90 / $55 are yearly-billed cards
Last checked
Luma AI 2026-10-20 · lumalabs.ai/pricing
Tripo 2026-10-22 · tripo3d.ai/pricing
Which one, then?
Pick Tripo if
game and print makers who will pay Pro so more than Free’s 200 public, non-commercial credits sit on a private asset.
Read the Tripo page