Pick Cursor if
software engineers already in git who want an agent in the editor.
Read the Cursor pageCursor vs Sourcegraph Cody
Our take
Pick Cursor if software engineers already in git who want an agent in the editor. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if companies already on Sourcegraph Enterprise that want chat + Execute against the same index. Skip Cursor if non-developers, or teams that cannot send code to a third-party model API. Skip Sourcegraph Cody if individual developers — use Amp (Hobby Free / Individual $20) or Continue.
Best for
Cursor Changing a real repo
Sourcegraph Cody Companies already on Sourcegraph Enterprise that want chat + Execute against the same
Free plan
Cursor $0 · limited Agent and Chat requests
Sourcegraph Cody No free plan
Lowest paid
Cursor Plus $8/mo · Grok models only
Sourcegraph Cody Sourcegraph Enterprise $16
Next step up
Cursor Premium $30/mo · other models at API price
Sourcegraph Cody Amp (separate company) $20/mo
Coding agent
Cursor Agent + Tab inside the editor
Sourcegraph Cody
Runs where
Cursor Desktop editor; models hosted
Sourcegraph Cody
Watch out
Cursor Plus is Grok-only
Sourcegraph Cody No self-serve Cody
Last checked
Cursor 2026-10-19 · cursor.com/pricing
Sourcegraph Cody 2026-10-22 · sourcegraph.com/pricing
Which one, then?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if
companies already on Sourcegraph Enterprise that want chat + Execute against the same index.
Read the Sourcegraph Cody page