Pick Continue if
developers who want the OSS extension and will point it at their own model.
Read the Continue pageContinue vs Sourcegraph Cody
Our take
Pick Continue if developers who want the OSS extension and will point it at their own model. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if companies already on Sourcegraph Enterprise that want chat + Execute against the same index. Skip Continue if people who want a maintained commercial IDE agent (Cursor, GitHub Copilot). Skip Sourcegraph Cody if individual developers — use Amp (Hobby Free / Individual $20) or Continue.
Best for
Continue An OSS Copilot-shaped sidebar you configure yourself
Sourcegraph Cody Companies already on Sourcegraph Enterprise that want chat + Execute against the same
Free plan
Continue $0 · apache 2.0. You pay the model provider
Sourcegraph Cody No free plan
Lowest paid
Continue Not published by the vendor
Sourcegraph Cody Sourcegraph Enterprise $16
Next step up
Continue
Sourcegraph Cody Amp (separate company) $20/mo
Coding agent
Continue User Settings
Sourcegraph Cody
Runs where
Continue Hosted
Sourcegraph Cody
Watch out
Continue The repo is read-only
Sourcegraph Cody No self-serve Cody
Last checked
Continue 2026-10-19 · continue.dev
Sourcegraph Cody 2026-10-22 · sourcegraph.com/pricing
Which one, then?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if
companies already on Sourcegraph Enterprise that want chat + Execute against the same index.
Read the Sourcegraph Cody page