aitoolsnav.com

Gitea vs Woodpecker

Our take

Pick Gitea if teams who will stay on Open Source at $0 (unlimited users/repos, community support) while they open a first dashboard, then buy Enterprise at $9.5 or $19 per user/month when they need SAML, audit logs, and SLA support. Pick Woodpecker if teams who already run Gitea / Forgejo / GitHub and will stay on the Apache self-host at $0 while they open a first pipeline log, then keep self-hosting because

Gitea

self-hosted git-forge desk

Best for

Gitea A forge you start at $0

Woodpecker Pipelines you start at $0 on your host

Free plan

Gitea $0 · self-hosted MIT. Unlimited users and repositories. Code hosting, issues, pull requests, project management, Gitea Actions, packages. Community support

Woodpecker $0 · apache-2.0. You run the server + one or more agents + a forge. Confirmed by the repo LICENSE (“Apache License / Version 2.0”)

Lowest paid

Gitea Enterprise $9.5/user/mo

Woodpecker Not published by the vendor

Coding agent

Gitea

Woodpecker Pipelines

Runs where

Gitea Local or hosted

Woodpecker

Watch out

Gitea $9.5 / $19 is per user / month with a 1-year online-payment commitment

Woodpecker $0 is the license, not the agent VM

Last checked

Gitea 2026-10-23 · about.gitea.com/pricing

Woodpecker 2026-10-23 · github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob

Which one, then?

Pick Gitea if

teams who will stay on Open Source at $0 (unlimited users/repos, community support) while they open a first dashboard, then buy Enterprise at $9.5 or $19 per user/month when they need SAML, audit logs, and SLA support.

Read the Gitea page

Pick Woodpecker if

teams who already run Gitea / Forgejo / GitHub and will stay on the Apache self-host at $0 while they open a first pipeline log, then keep self-hosting because Woodpecker does not print a hosted Cloud dollar.

Read the Woodpecker page

Other comparisons