aitoolsnav.com

FastGPT vs Langflow

Our take

Pick FastGPT if chinese/English teams who will self-host a knowledge assistant and already have a model key. Pick Langflow if developers and applied-AI teams who want a visual LangChain-style graph they can still edit as Python. Skip FastGPT if people who want an English-only hosted studio with a printed card (Dify) or a simple local chat (Open WebUI). Skip Langflow if non-technical ops teams that need Slack/HubSpot

FastGPT

FastGPT

self-hosted RAG/workflow studio

Langflow

Langflow

MIT visual builder for LLM agents and RAG

Best for

FastGPT Draw a knowledge workflow and publish a channel

Langflow Prototyping an agent

Free plan

FastGPT $0 · apache-2.0 with additional conditions. You bring the model key and a database

Langflow $0 · no license fee (MIT). You run uv pip install langflow or Docker. You pay your own LLM/provider bills

Lowest paid

FastGPT Not published by the vendor

Langflow Not published by the vendor

Coding agent

FastGPT

Langflow Visual agent canvas

Runs where

FastGPT Local or hosted

Langflow Local; you host it

Watch out

FastGPT $0 is the software, not the LLM

Langflow You bring the model key

Last checked

FastGPT 2026-10-21 · github.com/labring/FastGPT

Langflow 2026-10-19 · docs.langflow.org/get-started-installation

Which one, then?

Pick FastGPT if

chinese/English teams who will self-host a knowledge assistant and already have a model key.

Read the FastGPT page

Pick Langflow if

developers and applied-AI teams who want a visual LangChain-style graph they can still edit as Python.

Read the Langflow page

Other comparisons