aitoolsnav.com

Dagger vs Woodpecker

Our take

Pick Dagger if platform teams who will run the OSS engine at $0 while they write a first function, then start Starter’s Try for free and land on $20/month (1 user, 1-month traces) — or Scale at $200/month when they need unlimited users and 1-year traces. Pick Woodpecker if teams who already run Gitea / Forgejo / GitHub and will stay on the Apache self-host at $0 while they open a first pipeline log, then keep

Best for

Dagger A pipeline you start at $20

Woodpecker Pipelines you start at $0 on your host

Free plan

Dagger No free plan

Woodpecker $0 · apache-2.0. You run the server + one or more agents + a forge. Confirmed by the repo LICENSE (“Apache License / Version 2.0”)

Lowest paid

Dagger Starter $20/mo

Woodpecker Not published by the vendor

Next step up

Dagger Scale $200/mo

Woodpecker

Coding agent

Dagger

Woodpecker Pipelines

Runs where

Dagger Hosted

Woodpecker

Watch out

Dagger $20 is 1 user and 1-month traces

Woodpecker $0 is the license, not the agent VM

Last checked

Dagger 2026-10-22 · dagger.io/pricing

Woodpecker 2026-10-23 · github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob

Which one, then?

Pick Dagger if

platform teams who will run the OSS engine at $0 while they write a first function, then start Starter’s Try for free and land on $20/month (1 user, 1-month traces) — or Scale at $200/month when they need unlimited users and 1-year traces.

Read the Dagger page

Pick Woodpecker if

teams who already run Gitea / Forgejo / GitHub and will stay on the Apache self-host at $0 while they open a first pipeline log, then keep self-hosting because Woodpecker does not print a hosted Cloud dollar.

Read the Woodpecker page

Other comparisons