aitoolsnav.com

Continue vs Tabby

Our take

Pick Continue if developers who want the OSS extension and will point it at their own model. Pick Tabby if teams who will run Tabby on their own GPU (Community ≤5 users, or Team seats). Skip Continue if people who want a maintained commercial IDE agent (Cursor, GitHub Copilot). Skip Tabby if people who want a hosted IDE agent with published consumer cards (GitHub Copilot, Cursor).

Continue

Continue

open-source IDE coding agent (VS Code /

Tabby

Tabby

self-hosted coding assistant (completions

Best for

Continue An OSS Copilot-shaped sidebar you configure yourself

Tabby Copilot-shaped completion on your own box

Free plan

Continue $0 · apache 2.0. You pay the model provider

Tabby $0 · user/month. Open source. Up to 5 users. Local deployment. Completion, Answer Engine, in-line chat, context provider

Lowest paid

Continue Not published by the vendor

Tabby Team $19/user/mo

Coding agent

Continue User Settings

Tabby Completions and chat in your IDE

Runs where

Continue Hosted

Tabby Local or hosted

Watch out

Continue The repo is read-only

Tabby Community is 5 users

Last checked

Continue 2026-10-19 · continue.dev

Tabby 2026-10-19 · tabbyml.com/pricing

Which one, then?

Pick Continue if

developers who want the OSS extension and will point it at their own model.

Read the Continue page

Pick Tabby if

teams who will run Tabby on their own GPU (Community ≤5 users, or Team seats).

Read the Tabby page

Other comparisons