aitoolsnav.com

Consensus vs STORM

Our take

Pick Consensus if students and clinicians who want a paper-backed answer with a Pro/Deep meter. Pick STORM if writers and researchers who want a cited outline-to-draft, and can bring search/LLM keys to self-host. Skip Consensus if people who need a systematic-review screening table (Elicit) or a general cited web search (Perplexity).

Consensus

Consensus

hosted academic research composer

STORM

STORM

MIT topic-to-article engine

Best for

Consensus A question over peer-reviewed papers

STORM A Wikipedia-like first draft from a topic

Free plan

Consensus $0 · /mo. Basic paper search; 10 Pro messages/month; up to 3 Deep reviews/month

STORM $0

Lowest paid

Consensus Pro (annual display) $12/mo

STORM

Next step up

Consensus Deep (annual display) $45/mo

STORM

Runs where

Consensus Hosted

STORM Local; you host it

Watch out

Consensus Free Pro messages and Deep reviews are capped

STORM Preview drafts are not publication-ready

Last checked

Consensus 2026-10-19 · consensus.app/pricing

STORM 2026-10-22 · github.com/stanford-oval/storm

Which one, then?

Pick Consensus if

students and clinicians who want a paper-backed answer with a Pro/Deep meter.

Read the Consensus page

Pick STORM if

writers and researchers who want a cited outline-to-draft, and can bring search/LLM keys to self-host.

Read the STORM page

Other comparisons